Category Archives: Shoe Review

Shoe Review – NikeiD

Okay, I’m not going to really review all the different NikeiD styles because there are so many of them. Instead, what I wanted you to know, is how much fun the NikeiD process is.

Basically, you pick the shoe design, the colors and some of the materials which make up the shoes. For example – upper color, logo color, insole color and shoelaces.

The above image shows a pair brought in today ($110), which are fun and original. This is the Nike Dunk Low iD Men’s Shoe and it’s surprisingly stable compared to similiar shoes like Vans.

Shoe Review – FitFlops

Reader and Medical Student Tony asks “What do you think about the FitFlop?”.

I think FitFlops are great. They have nice wide straps and a thick, contoured soles. I have used them successfully with narrow, shallow feet (Wiley’s Felt Remedy required) and wide, deep feet. I don’t however believe the company’s claims about muscle work-outs, toning and trimming of the legs so don’t buy them for this reason.

If you’re looking for a fun, comfy, well designed, well made and well fitting flip flops, then FitFlops may just be for you.

Shoe Review – New Balance 768

Reader Andrea asks “Could you please review the New Balance 767? I have a relatively narrow foot and wear orthotics for my high and collapsing arch.”

I’m not familiar with the NB 767 model, but I am familiar with the 768 which is the next version. My problem with the 768 is it has a very deep toe box even in the narrow width.

On the plus side – it will work with an orthotic and it won’t strangulate your high arch. Just make sure it doesn’t fail the pinch test: https://drshoe.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/pinch-test-shoe-toebox/

If it does, then you might want to try Asics 2130 in medium, since this has a shallower toe box, fits the narrow foot with a high arch nicely and will work with an orthotic.


Shoe Review – La Sportiva Trango Trek GTX

Thanks to Bill for bringing in this pair of hiking boot today. This is a great boot if you have a narrow, deep foot. Vasque is for a narrow shallow foot, whereas LaSportiva is for those feet having slightly more volume with a narrow width.

This is a sturdy hiking boot good for variable terrain including lots of hills. It also cinches up tight for narrower ankles.This boot can be found at REI and several other retailers for around $180.

Shoe of the Month – Allen Edmonds Broadstreet Saddle Shoe

At least once a month, someone brings in a shoe that is so fine, it needs its own shoe review.

This months shoe was brought in by Randolph and is so gorgeous, that everyone in the office had to stop and admire. It’s perfect for a narrow foot and comes in brown too.

A spectator style from the 30’s, this shoe is also part of Allen Edmonds, Custom Program. Which means you may order any current style in any color or leather in their line. You may decide to substitute one type of sole for another. They will also customize footwear for individuals with feet of two different sizes.

Allen Edmonds – what a great Company!

Shoe Review – Asics 2130 (Running vs. Trail Shoes)

I ordered a pair of Asics 2130 running shoes from Zappos.com which turned out to be slightly short. Since I do more outdoor walking than running, I decided to order the Asics 2130 trail shoes instead, and was surprised to discover they are not the same shoe. The running 2130 is on the left, whereas the trail running 2130 is on the right.

The 2130 trail shoes are much wider than the Asics 2130 running shoes. The Asics 2130 trail shoes are much deeper than the running shoe version.

And the Asics 2130 running shoe is shorter than the same length 2130 trail running shoe.

Once again even though both shoes have the same name and outsole design, they are entirely different shoes. Make sure you thoroughly check the different version of the same shoe, because more and more, they will not be the same.

Shoe Review – Asics 2130

It’s usually difficult to find a snug fitting running shoe if you have a narrow foot. Even harder if you have a narrow, shallow foot. Nearly impossible if you have a narrow, shallow foot with a bunion.

I was pleased when a patient brought this shoe in today, especially because it fits the narrow, shallow foot perfectly. The Asics 2130 comes in a 2A (narrow), B (medium) and D (width), and all work for a shallow (flat) foot type.

asics_2130.gif

The Asics Gel Kayano also works for a narrow foot, but the 2130 actually is slightly more shallow and narrow and significantly lower in price.

Don’t miss my other 2130 posts:  https://drshoe.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/womens-asics-2130-updated-styles/

https://drshoe.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/shoe-review-asics-2130-new-vs-old-differences/

https://drshoe.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/shoe-review-asics-2130-running-vs-trail-shoes/

Shoe Review – Asics GEL-Kayano

A marathon runner came in today with a worn pair of GEL-Kayano 12 and a new pair of GEL-Kayano 14. Even though both shoes were sized the same length and width, they were entirely different shoes.

gel_kayano.gif

First, look at the outsole. The newer version is on the left and the older version is on the right. There is more soft EVA in the worn outsole on the right, which would cause the forefoot padding of the shoe to break down sooner.

If you have a history of ball of the foot pain (capsulitis, sesamoiditis, metatarsalgia), you will want your outsole EVA to be as firm as possible, so the left model would be better for you.

gel_kayano_3.gif

Next look at the upper. See how the older Asics on the left is wider in the toebox and in the heel opening or throatline? In this case, if you have a wider foot or a higher arch, the older version would be a better fit for you.

All in all, even though the name is the same, the versions are not. Bottom line – these differing versions are entirely different shoes. Although both are shallow in toebox depth, version 12 will work best if you have a wide, shallow foot whereas version 14 will work better if you have a narrow, shallow foot.

Beware of version upgrades and check them carefully. Even if you shoe salesman swears up and down there is no difference, don’t take their word for it, make sure with your own eyes and hands it is indeed the same shoe.

Nike Air Pegasus vs. New Balance 992

This person’s foot size measured a 7 1/2 narrow. Imagine my surprise when I placed her current shoes side by side, end up and discovered the following:

nike_new_balance.gif

The Nike Air Pegasus on the left was sized 7 1/2, while the New Balance 992 on the right was sized a 7.0. Even though the New Balance was lasted smaller, it was easily a size longer and considerably deeper than the other shoe.

When shopping for shoes it is important to keep in mind, that size is an approximation only, and not necessarily consistent from shoe to shoe. In the case the size 7 1/2 Nike shoes fit like a glove, whereas the size 7.o New Balance were much too long and deep.

As with everything. Buyer beware – you can’t judge a shoe by a manufactures designated size.

Shoe Review – Brooks Beast

Brooks Beast is a tank. Great for those of us with wide, deep feet. Slightly heavy, torsionally stable (no lengthwise twist), with a heel slightly wider than the forefoot.

I must say, however, I was disappointed to see the change in this years model, compared to prior years. Today, someone came in having ankle and ball of the foot pain, which didn’t happen with his prior year Beast models.

Unfortunately, a quick comparision of 2006 vs. 2007 models shows considerable differences between the same brand name shoes. Today’s runner, started feeling the pain, with his new shoes.

brooks.gif

Not only is this years model (blue) narrower, it also has a less thick (shock absorptive) outsole and a less deep toe box.

brooks3.gif

For many people wearing Brooks Beast, the above changes won’t make much of a difference and this shoe will still be fine. If you have ball of the foot pain though or need a deeper shoe, then these design changes may mean the difference between comfort and pain.

Even though a shoe keeps the name, you always want to compare it to the prior model, as design changes may help a shoe company’s bottom line, but not necessarily your foot.

Shoe Review – Crocs

Yes, I know Crocs clogs have been all the rage for quite sometime. Yes, they’re lightweight and slip on and off easily, which are all big plusses for those of us who hate tying our shoe laces.

The problem is, for most of us, they’re WAY too big. And if you have a narrow foot – don’t even think about buying this particular style.

crocs.gif

If you’re foot fits in your Crocs like this foot, then you may be doing more harm than good. In the above picture, even thick socks won’t help you keep the shoe on.

A foot that fits properly in a shoe, should be going straight ahead, not side to side, and not up and down, which is what the foot in the above shoe does. The result – callous, forefoot and even heel pain, all because the clog doesn’t fit right.

Shoe Review – Brooks Adrenaline

This week I recommended Brooks Adrenaline running shoes to three different runners, each having narrow, shallow feet. One runner was a female, the other two runners were male.

Not surprisingly, each runner had a different injury (neuroma, Achilles tendonitis, plantar fasciitis), which wasn’t getting better, because their running shoes didn’t fit right . For these anatomically challenged feet, few running shoes fit.

Most running shoe uppers are made too wide and/or deep for narrow feet. Unfortunately, this is true, even if the running shoe is sized in a narrow width. Given this frustrating state of affairs, what’s a narrow foot to do?

Enter Brooks Adrenaline GTS to the rescue…

brooks_bottom_2.gif

brooks_side.gif

On the left is the Adrenaline and on the right is the Addiction. Even though both shoes are made by Brooks and both are sized medium width, they are entirely different shoes. The Adrenaline is narrow and shallow. The Addiction is wide and deep.

If your foot is narrow and you are a runner, then the Brooks Adrenaline is definitely a shoe you should try. Women with narrow feet usually do better in a 2A width and men with narrow feet usually do better in the D width of this shoe. Unsure of what width to get, try both in narrow and medium and let your feet decide!

Shoe Review – Dansko Clogs

Dansko clogs are great for lots of painful foot conditions providing your foot is the right type. If you have pain in the balls of your feet (metatarsalgia), Dansko clogs are terrific because they don’t flex. People having plantar fasciitis (arch/heel pain), can also benefit from Dansko clogs, because of their built in arch support and torsional stability.

However, if you have a narrow or shallow foot, then this is not the shoe for you. Even if you buy the narrow width version, they will generally still be too deep, for a narrow foot.

If on the other hand you have a wide foot or a medium height arch, then this is a great shoe for you.

The following young woman came into my office today having plantar fasciitis, wearing Dansko clogs. Even though she has a wide forefoot, her overall foot depth is flat and shallow. In her case, she was swimming in the clogs, especially on the right side, which had the arch pain.
sherise_barefoot.gif

dansko_clogs.gif

Because of the excess room and heel slippage she was experiencing in the above Dansko clogs, I showed her several pair of non-Dansko clogs on Zappos. com, that will give her the extra height she’s looking for, without adding excess depth in the vamp.

CNetTV & Me on Masai Barefoot Technology

I oftentimes am asked to comment on new shoe technology. Kara Tsuboi of CNet TV did a story on Masai Barefoot Technology (MBT’s) and interviewed me. Here’s a link to her video, where opinions, fact and fiction are explored.

http://www.cnettv.com/9742-1_53-31862.html

mbt.gif

My Masai Barefoot Technology review – MBT’s are heavy, wobbly, expensive and don’t work for every foot type (especially narrow) And, if you’re younger than 30, I doubt you would find them suitably fashionable to wear on your feet.

Men’s Dress Shoe Review – Narrow, Shallow Foot

Zappos. com is one of my favorite places for hard to fit feet. I especially like the multi-view feature to help evaluate a shoe’s width, depth and design.

Last week I picked out a dozen pair of men’s dress shoes for Jonathan, and today he showed up with a box of 7 pair to evaluate. All, were very handsome, but only the following two pair made the cut. An added bonus, they even worked with his bulky orthotics!

Even though Jonathan has a narrow foot, he could wear these shoes which came in a medium width, because of their shallow depth.

Johnston & Murphy – Bickel Panel Toe

bickel_panel_toe.gif

Johnston & Murphy – Gosney Moc Toe Lace-Up

gosney_lace.gif

Shoe Review – New Balance 858

I enjoy asking someone their shoe size right before I measure their foot…According to my unscientific research, at least 70% of the feet I measure, are being put into the wrong size shoe.

I don’t enjoy discovering that someone’s foot size (heel to ball) measures an 11.5 and the running shoes they have been wearing is a 10…which might also explain why their toenails are turning purple.
7769-484813-51.jpg
And…I am shocked and appalled when I come across a shoe that has a different heel to ball length vs. heel to toe length. New Balance 858 is such a shoe. A design flaw, I call ‘disproportionate’. In this case, the shoes arch length is long relative to the toe box length. Fine for someone who has really short stubby toes, but way too short in the toe box for the rest of us. Oh, I almost forgot, that would be short stubby toes and narrow foot, because of the narrow outsole, which makes this shoe a nearly impossible match to anyones foot.

To their credit, New Balance makes many styles of shoes, and this is one very specific style. And this one style doesn’t make all New Balance shoes bad, (i.e, “1 bad apple don’t spoil the whole bunch, girl…”) and most manufactures make ‘disproportionate’ shoes once in a while.

As a member of my posse, your job will be to stop buying disproportionate shoes. Eventually, when these styles don’t sell, shoe manufacturers will stop producing them, and eventually, shoes will start to fit better.